Commuting allowance: detour possible?

Only if a detour to work is clearly faster does it count for tax purposes. The Lower Saxony tax court shows: The hurdles for the commuting allowance are high.
Published by Patricia Lederer 21.06.2025 um 08:00 Uhr

Distance allowance for detours: When the tax office recognizes longer distances

If you drive to work every day, you can claim the costs against tax using the commuting allowance. However, not every route actually traveled is accepted by the tax office. In principle, the shortest road connection between home and the first place of work counts. Only if a longer route is obviously more convenient may it be used.

A recent ruling by the Lower Saxony Fiscal Court on April 3, 2024 shows how strictly this requirement is applied in practice.

What was the dispute about

One employee wanted to use a 102-kilometer route instead of the 74.8-kilometer shortest route. He justified this with better traffic routing, fewer traffic lights and less risk of traffic jams. The court did not accept these arguments. The longer route was not recognized.

What obviously means more convenient

According to the law, a route other than the shortest route may only be used if it regularly leads to a faster and more punctual arrival. The advantages must be so clear that even an objective third party would opt for this route. Individual traffic jams or occasional time advantages are not sufficient.

Health reasons only with supporting documents

In the specific case, the employee also claimed health restrictions. He was unable to use the shorter route due to a back problem. The court was not convinced by this. Above all, this was not because the plaintiff actually drove the shorter route in later years.

Conclusion for practice

If you want to claim a longer distance for tax purposes, you need to be well prepared. It is not enough to refer to general traffic problems or personal preferences. Only if the longer route is demonstrably faster or there are compelling reasons can it be recognized. Clear evidence is required.

In the event of ambiguities or rejection by the tax office, a legal review is worthwhile. We are happy to help.

Are you unsure? Get your first aid!

Are you at a loss with your request? Not sure whether you are using the right document or how to proceed?

Then book your individual first aid consultation with our legal experts.
Personal. Clear. To the point.

  • Answers to your specific questions
  • Practical, understandable, without legalese
  • Book quickly – with your preferred date

Law doesn’t have to be complicated – just explained correctly.

👉Get first aid advice from PepperPapers now!

Foto Patricia Lederer
Patricia Lederer
Author and managing director of PepperPapers

Patricia Lederer is a specialist lawyer for tax law, commercial and corporate law. Lederer specializes in national and international tax law and criminal tax law. She works in the areas of tax audits, tax investigations and represents clients in court proceedings before the tax courts nationwide, the Federal Fiscal Court, the Federal Constitutional Court and the European Court of Human Rights.
EN